Williams v. D'Angelo et al

Defendant: Hunter Truck Sales & Service, Inc. and Anthony Michael D'Angelo
Plaintiff: Atrondra R. Williams
Case Number: 5:2013cv00054
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: West Virginia Northern District Court
Office: Wheeling Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: Frederick P. Stamp
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. D'Angelo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hunter Truck Sales & Service, Inc.
Represented By: R. Scott Long
Represented By: Christopher S. Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Michael D'Angelo
Represented By: R. Scott Long
Represented By: Christopher S. Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atrondra R. Williams
Represented By: Eric M. Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.