United States of America v. Timothy W. Canaday, et al.
| United States of America |
| Timothy W. Canaday, Elizabeth Canaday, Lakie June Wood Clower and Sheriff of Mercer County |
| 1:2011cv00607 |
| September 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| Mercer |
| David A. Faber |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: the USA's 15 MOTION to Substitute Party: The court SCHEDULES a hearing for 8/15/2017 at 10:30 AM in Bluefield before Judge David A. Faber. At that hearing, the court will consider whether there is any objection to the order of substitution and whether it should be vacated. Plaintiff is directed to serve this Order "on the parties as provided in Rule 5 and on nonparties as provided in Rule 4." Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 7/17/2017. (cc: counsel of record and unrepresented parties) (arb)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 15 MOTION to Substitute T. A. Bailey as representative of the Estate of Timothy W. Canaday, as a party in this action for the deceased defendant, Timothy W. Canaday, is GRANTED. This matter was stayed because Canaday filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy proceeding having been concluded, that stay is LIFTED and the Clerk is directed to REINSTATE this matter to the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 6/29/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
