Saratoga Advantage Trust v. ICG, Inc., et al.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District Saratoga Advantage Trust v. ICG, Inc., et al.

Saratoga Advantage Trust v. ICG, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff:	Saratoga Advantage Trust
Defendant:	ICG, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2008cv00011
Filed:	January 7, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Kanawha
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 21, 2009	Filing 69 ORDER The court accepts the 67 Stipulation re: the 65 First Amended Class Action Complaint as more fully set forth herein; defendants shall respond by 8/6/2009; if the defendants respond via motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs shall respond to the motion by 8/20/2009 and the defendants shall reply to the response by 8/31/2009. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/21/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)
March 20, 2009	Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 21 MOTION for appointment of Saratoga Advantage Trust as lead plaintiff and for approval of Finkelstein & Krinks LLP as lead counsel and The Giatras Law Firm as liaison counsel; further directing that Saratoga is appointed as lead plaintiff; Finkelstein & Krinsk, LLP is approved as lead counsel and The Giatras Law Firm is approved as liaison counsel. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/20/2009. (cc: attys) (mkw)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 21, 2009

Filing 69 ORDER The court accepts the 67 Stipulation re: the 65 First Amended Class Action Complaint as more fully set forth herein; defendants shall respond by 8/6/2009; if the defendants respond via motion to dismiss, the plaintiffs shall respond to the motion by 8/20/2009 and the defendants shall reply to the response by 8/31/2009. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/21/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (ras)

March 20, 2009

Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 21 MOTION for appointment of Saratoga Advantage Trust as lead plaintiff and for approval of Finkelstein & Krinks LLP as lead counsel and The Giatras Law Firm as liaison counsel; further directing that Saratoga is appointed as lead plaintiff; Finkelstein & Krinsk, LLP is approved as lead counsel and The Giatras Law Firm is approved as liaison counsel. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/20/2009. (cc: attys) (mkw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saratoga Advantage Trust v. ICG, Inc., et al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saratoga Advantage Trust
Represented By:	Jeffrey R. Krinsk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ICG, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?