Bragg v. American Optical Corporation
Plaintiff: Bobby Bragg
Defendant: American Optical Corporation
Case Number: 2:2010cv00995
Filed: August 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 77 U.S.C. ยง 7777
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the parties' 25 UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION for Remand to the Circuit Court of Fayette County. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 11/4/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; Clerk, Circuit Court of Fayette County, WV) (taq)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bragg v. American Optical Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobby Bragg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Optical Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?