Morris v. Dunn

Plaintiff: Matthew Morris
Defendant: Jimmy A. Dunn
Case Number: 2:2010cv01034
Filed: August 19, 2010
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Kanawha
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 77:7777
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 7, 2011 11 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; dismissing the plaintiff's 2 Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and denying as moot the plaintiff's 1 application to proceed without prepayment of fees. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 2/7/2011. (cc: plaintiff; attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy A. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.