Woods et al v. Oxford Law, LLC et al
||Jessica Woods and Joshua Evans
||Oxford Law, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
||March 28, 2013
||West Virginia Southern District Court
||John T. Copenhaver
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 6, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 8 MOTION to Enforce the Settlement Agreement; directing the plaintiff's to pursue a default judgment by submitting, no later than June 26, 2014, a motion for entry of defau lt judgment, with appropriate affidavits and exhibits, along with a detailed proposed order granting the relief requested, with notice thereof to Robert Kline, the attorney for Oxford Law, LLC, with whom plaintiffs counsel has been negotiating. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/6/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)
|February 24, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs' 12 MOTION for default judgment; granting said motion to the extent set forth more fully herein, and otherwise denying said motion; the plaintiffs are awarded against Oxford Law, LLC the sum of $10,121.00; and the plaintiffs' claims against John Does 1-10 are dismissed without prejudice; the plaintiffs' renewing request for attorney's fees and costs due by 3/16/2015; defendant may respond by 3/26/2015. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/24/2015. (cc: counsel of record; defendant, certified mail, return receipt requested, at 311 Veterans Highway, Suite 100A, Levittown, Pennsylvania, 19056) (taq)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.