Pendleton v. WV Division of Corrections et al
| Ricky Vincent Pendleton |
| Kelli Hinte, Sherrie Snyder, Cheryl Chandler, Michael Shumate, Patrick Janiszewski, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Lisa Boggs |
| 2:2015cv01903 |
| July 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Fayette |
| Dwane L. Tinsley |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing (1) the plaintiff's 88 Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation are overruled; (2) the magistrate judge's 87 Proposed Findings and Recommendation are adopted and incorporated in full; (3) the defendants' 73 Supplemental Motion to Dismiss is granted; and(4) this civil action be dismissed and stricken from the docket of the court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/27/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (kew)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying without prejudice plaintiff's 44 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying plaintiff's 47 MOTION for Expedited Relief, 54 MOTION for Expedited and Injunctive Relief, and 57 MOTION for Injunctive Relief and Declaratory Judgment. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/19/2016. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record; magistrate judge) (tmh)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the Court adopts and incorporates the 60 Proposed Findings and Recommendation only to the extent it addresses the dismissal of defendants Boggs, Janiszewski, Shumate, and the West Virginia Division of Corrections; the C ourt ORDERS defendants' 23 motion to dismiss the amended complaint granted with respect to defendants Boggs, Janiszewski, Shumate, and otherwise denied, and those three defendants are ORDERED dismissed; inasmuch as the West Virginia Division o f Corrections has been omitted by the plaintiff from his amended complaint, it is also ORDERED dismissed; the court also ORDERS that, to the extent the same filing presents an alternative motion for summary judgment, that motion is denied without pre judice; directing the clerk to terminate the 65 motion for a right to reply, the court having construed the filing as a reply rather than an independent motion for relief; the court further ORDERS this matter re-referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/31/2016. (cc: plaintiff, all counsel of record, and the magistrate judge) (skh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
