Adkins v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jessica Adkins
Defendant: Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv00814
Filed: June 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Huntington Office
County: Cabell
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1211
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 55 Plaintiff's MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 57 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/23/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adkins v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Adkins
Represented By: Amy C. Crossan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?