Roseberry v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Lena Suzanne Roseberry
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv04895
Filed: April 21, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Huntington Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A. Eifert
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION finding that the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner; and dismissing this matter from the docket of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/2/2016. (cc: counsel of record) (jsa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roseberry v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lena Suzanne Roseberry
Represented By: James T. Meisel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Eric P. Kressman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?