Piziak v. Keller et al
Michael Piziak |
Greg Darby, Pat Lamp, Ed Bibb, Kristen Keller, Tom Truman, Tom MacAuley, Andrew Dimlich, William Richmond, John Gallaher and Cory Beasley |
5:2012cv05728 |
September 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Beckley Office |
Raleigh |
Irene C. Berger |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the 23 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and ORDERS as follows: Plaintiff's 1 Application to Proceed without P repayment of Fees is DENIED; Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Immediate Injuctive relief is DENIED; Plaintiff's 5 Motion to Prevent Incarceration is DENIED; Defendants Andrew Dimlich, Pat Lamp, John Gallaher, Tom MacAuley, Ed Bibb, Krist en Keller, William Richmond and Tom Truman's 14 Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED; Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED; Defendants Little General Stores, Greg Darby, and Cory Beasley's 17 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED AS MOOT; Defendants Andrew Dimlich, Pat Lamp, John Gallaher, Tom MacAuley, Ed Bibb, Kristen Keller, William Richmond, and Tom Truman's 8 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Stop Incarceration is DENIED AS MOOT; and this matter is REMOVED from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 5/15/2013. (cc: USMJ VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (msa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.