White v. Sam's East, Inc., et. al.
| Frank White |
| Sam's East, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv26106 |
| September 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's 51 MOTION to Compel; specifically, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Compel as it applies to Wal-Mart and Sam's regarding their respective Interrogatory Nos. 1, and, based upon the Court's ruling, the respective Interrogatory Nos. 1 are ORDERED modified as detailed herein; the Court DENIES the Motion to Compel to the extent it sought discovery on the stated issue encompassing all W al-Mart and Sam's stores in the United States; the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Compel as to Interrogatory No. 6 directed to Wal-Mart, and, based upon the Court's ruling, Interrogatory No. 6 is ORDERED modified as detailed herein ; the Court DENIES the Motion to Compel to the extent it sought discovery on accommodation determinations by the entire Accommodation Service Center, other than Ben Cormack; the Court FINDS that the Defendants' objections were substantially justified and declines to order an award of expenses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/15/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
