United States of America v. Veteran Pacific JV et al
United States of America |
Veteran Pacific JV, Old Veteran Construction Inc, Pacific Construction Services Inc and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company |
1:2010cv00826 |
September 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Green Bay Office |
Jefferson |
William C Griesbach |
Miller Act |
40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 4/22/2013. The Motion to Strike the declaration of Michael Roach 60 is granted. The remaining Motions to Strike 61 , 70 , and 71 are denied. The Motion in Limine 44 is denied and both parties' Motions for Summary Judgment 48 and 51 are denied. The clerk is directed to set this matter on for further proceedings. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Filing 20 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 04/06/2011. The motion is granted as it relates to the quantum meruit and unjust enrichment claims against Joint Venture, Old Veteran and Pacific, and those claims (Count III and IV) are dismissed without prejudice. The motion to dismiss is denied in all other respects. The Clerk is directed to schedule a Rule 16(b) conference forthwith. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.