WOW Logistics Company v. Pro-Pac Inc

Appellant: WOW Logistics Company
Appellee: Pro-Pac Inc
Case Number: 2:2011cv01075
Filed: November 22, 2011
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Walworth
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 14, 2012 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 8/14/2012 REVERSING and REMANDING the decision of the bankruptcy court, with instructions to dismiss the claims against the appellant. (cc: all counsel)(nts)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOW Logistics Company v. Pro-Pac Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: WOW Logistics Company
Represented By: David J Hanus
Represented By: Noah D Fiedler
Represented By: Brett B Larsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Pro-Pac Inc
Represented By: Joseph R Cincotta
Represented By: Jerome R Kerkman
Represented By: Evan P Schmit
Represented By: Gregory M Schrieber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.