Chapes v. Pro-Pac Inc

Appellee: Pro-Pac Inc
Appellant: George Chapes, III
Case Number: 2:2011cv01076
Filed: November 22, 2011
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Walworth
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 30, 2012 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 5/30/12 as follows: AFFIRMING the bankruptcy court's memorandum decision that the appellant breached his fiduciary duty to Pro-Pac; AFFIRMING the bankruptcy court's memorandum decision awarding $50,000.00 in punitive damages against appellant George Chapes III for his intentional disregard for Pro-Pacs rights; and DISMISSING this appeal. (cc: all counsel)(nm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chapes v. Pro-Pac Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Pro-Pac Inc
Represented By: Jerome R Kerkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: George Chapes, III
Represented By: William P Dineen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.