Prolitec Inc v. ScentAir Technologies Inc Has Decisions

Share |
Plaintiff: Prolitec Inc 
Defendant: ScentAir Technologies Inc
 
Case Number: 2:2012cv00483
Filed: May 15, 2012
 
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee         Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: Rudolph T Randa
 
Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property - Patent
Cause: 35:145
Jurisdiction: Federal Question        
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff        
 

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
Date Filed#Document Text
May 17, 201362Court Opinion or Order ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 5/17/2013. 47 MOTION to Stay Litigation pending inter partes review GRANTED: Clerk of Court DIRECTED to close matter for statistical purposes only, matter to be reopened upon filing of statement advising th e Court that inter partes review has been completed. 54 MOTION to Clarify the Protective Order GRANTED to extent that Gregor and Peterson may participate in inter partes review; neither may amend, substitute, or add claims to either patent during proceeding. 56 MOTION to Enjoin Gregor and Peterson from participating in inter partes review GRANTED to the extent that neither may amend, substitute, or add claims to either patent during proceeding. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
January 10, 201333Court Opinion or Order ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 1/10/2013: Parties' stipulated protective order 31 filed 1/8/2013 is VACATED-see order for details; 24 Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Prolitec Inc. is DENIED; 28 Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Strike or in the alternative Compel as to Prolitec's Deficient Infringement Contentionsfiled by ScentAir Technologies Inc. is DENIED. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
September 7, 201217Court Opinion or Order ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 9/7/2012 GRANTING Prolitec's request that all fact discovery proceed immediately; GRANTING ScentAir's request that Prolitec produce six categories of infringement-related documents. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
Last Document Downloaded: May 18, 2013 07:06:30 PDT

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Prolitec Inc v. ScentAir Technologies Inc
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prolitec Inc 
Represented By: Anthony S Baish, Jennifer L Gregor, Nicholas A Kees, Andrew C Landsman and James D Peterson
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ScentAir Technologies Inc
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]