Peterson v. Mid-State Group Inc

Defendant: Mid-State Group Inc
Plaintiff: John S Peterson
Case Number: 2:2013cv00447
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Walworth
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 10, 2014 41 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/10/14 granting 37 Motion for Leave to File a sur-reply brief; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel) (dm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Mid-State Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mid-State Group Inc
Represented By: Mary E Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John S Peterson
Represented By: Janice M Pintar
Represented By: Noah Reinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.