Ziegler v. Schwochert
Scott Edward Ziegler |
Jim Schwochert |
2:2013cv00609 |
May 31, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Fond du Lac |
Lynn Adelman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, denying petition for writ of habeas corpus and denying to issue a certificate of appealability signed by Judge Brett Ludwig on 10/27/20. (cc: all counsel) (MP) |
Filing 66 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/21/2017 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 57 the respondent's motion to dismiss. The court GRANTS the motion to dismiss all but Ground Sixty of the claims in the petition. The petitioner has 45 days from the date of the order to file his brief in support of his petition; the respondent has 45 days after the clerk of court dockets the petitioner's initial brief to file an opposition; and the petitioner has 30 days after the respondent serve his opposition to file any reply brief. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to petitioner)(pwm) |
Filing 54 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/17/2016 DENYING 51 Petitioner's Request to Require Counsel to Craft Petition; DENYING 52 Petitioner's Motion for Discovery and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing; LIFTING the Stay Imposed on 10/16/2015, TERMINATING Attorney Matthew Pinix as attorney for the Petitioner; and Setting a Scheduling Order. Please refer to the order for scheduling details. (cc: all counsel; by US Mail to Petitioner) (pwm) |
Filing 44 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 10/16/2015 GRANTING 43 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration and Appointing Counsel for a Limited Purpose. (cc: all counsel; by hand delivery to Federal Defender Service)(pwm) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 10/8/2015 Screening Complaint and Requiring Response. (cc: all counsel, copy of the order sent to the petitioner by US Mail on October 8, 2015, and copy of the order and petition sent to the Attorney General for the State of Wisconsin, and the Warden of Dodge Correctional Institution by US Mail on October 8, 2015.)(kgw) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/12/13 staying case pending the conclusion of petitioners state-court proceedings. Petitioner must inform the court and respondent every 90 days of the status of his state-court cases. Within 30 days after conclusion of his state-court proceedings, petitioner must notify the court and respondent that they have concluded. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner)(dm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ziegler v. Schwochert | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Scott Edward Ziegler | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Jim Schwochert | |
Represented By: | Aaron R O'Neil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.