Legler v. Exxel Outdoors Inc

Plaintiff: Jamie Legler
Defendant: Exxel Outdoors Inc
Case Number: 2:2013cv00668
Filed: June 12, 2013
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Waukesha
Presiding Judge: Rudolph T Randa
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 29, 2014 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 7/29/2014. 15 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim GRANTED. (cc: all counsel)(cb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Legler v. Exxel Outdoors Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Legler
Represented By: Mark M Grossman
Represented By: Tejal P Fowler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exxel Outdoors Inc
Represented By: Jeffrey N Costakos
Represented By: Kimberly K Dodd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.