Hanson v. Clements

Respondent: Marc W Clements
Petitioner: Daniel L Hanson
 
Case Number: 2:2013cv00896
Filed: August 7, 2013
 
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Dodge
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
 
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed#Document Text
November 26, 2013 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/25/13 denying 9 Motion to Consolidate Cases; denying without prejudice 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 19 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 21 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 26 Motion for Default Judgment. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner) (dm)
September 25, 2014 63 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/25/14 granting 23 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment. I find that the petitioner has not made the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) , and I will not issue a certificate of appealability. Further ordering as follows: denying 39 Motion for Order; denying 41 Motion for Judgment; denying 43 Motion to Compel; denying 44 Motion for Order; denying 45 Motion for Order; de nying 46 Motion to Vacate ; denying 52 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 52 Motion for Contempt; denying 54 Motion for Hearing; denying 61 Motion for Order; denying 62 Motion ; denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 29 Motion for Discovery; denying 31 Motion for Hearing; denying 34 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 36 Motion for Discovery; denying 39 Motion. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner) (dm) Modified on 9/25/2014 (dm).
September 12, 2013 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/12/13 that within 30 days of the date of this order respondent ANSWER the petition, showing cause, if any, why the writ should not issue. Further ordering that unless respondent files a dispositive motion with its answer the parties shall abide by the briefing schedule set forth herein. (cc: all counsel, via USPS to petitioner)(dm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Hanson v. Clements
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Marc W Clements
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel L Hanson
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]