Graham v. Hepp
Petitioner: Roland Derliel Graham
Respondent: Randall Hepp
Case Number: 2:2015cv00333
Filed: March 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Dodge
Presiding Judge: Rudolph T Randa
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 4/9/2015. By 6/10/2015 Respondent to file answer, motion, or other responsive pleading. By 5/15/2015 Petitioner to file petition and affidavit to proceed without prepayment of fees and/or costs. (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Roland Graham at Fox Lake Correctional Institution-with petition)(cb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Hepp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roland Derliel Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Randall Hepp
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?