Natcom Bankshares, Inc. v. Johnson, Brenda et al
| NATCOM Bancshares, Inc. |
| Brenda L. Johnson, Murray R. Johnson, Diana T. Johnson, Troy R. Johnson, Megan P. Johnson, Maren S. Johnson and Trent P. Johnson |
| 3:2012cv00334 |
| May 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Respondents M. P. J., M. S. J., T. R. J., T. P. J., Brenda L. Johnson, Diana T. Johnson, Murray R. Johnson dismissing the case. (BBC / PAO). (krj)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER that fair value of petitioner's stock was $780 as of 12/11; respondents entitled to interest on value of shares from 12/29/11 to 1/20/12 and to interest on unpaid interest at rate of 3.25% from 1/20/12 until payment made; petiti oner did not act arbitrarily, vexatiously or in bad faith in treatment of respondents re conversion of corporation; respondents did not act in bad faith re exercise of dissenters' rights; exhibit list amended to show exhibits 615 and 616 received, with exception of answer to interrogatory no. 14 of exhibit 615 and answer to interrogatory no. 1 of exhibit 616. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/12/13. (krj)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER on 3/28/13 telephone pretrial conference. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/28/13. (krj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
