Gruenberg, Darrin v. Casper et al
| Darrin A. Gruenberg |
| Casper, M. Voeck, N. Johnson, J. Raymond, D. Schuster, C. Laffin, D. Leatherberry, Jane Doe and Possibly two to three unidentified Deputy John/Jane Does |
| 3:2013cv00089 |
| February 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER that plaintiff Darrin Gruenberg's motions for assistance in recruiting counsel (13-cv-089, dkt. #43; 13-cv-095, dkt. #39; 13-cv-453, dkt. #31) are DENIED. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/10/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER denying 16 motion for reconsideration; denying 19 Plaintiff's objection to answer and motion to strike affirmative defenses; denying 22 motion for assistance in recruiting counsel; denying 24 motion for assistance in recruiting counsel. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/29/2014. (nln),(ps) Modified on 7/29/2014 (nln).
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 65.43 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 2/27/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/6/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
