Evans, Eddie v. Raemisch, Rick et al
| Eddie Gene Evans |
| Pugh, Calvin Sanders #337369, Roy S. Frederickson, Jon M. Theisen, Catrina Semanko, Richardson, Warren Dohms, John Fiorello, Carol J. Braines, Julie Cavanaugh, Sam Schneider, Mark Mellanthin, Roberta Gaithers, Sharon Williams, Rick Raemisch, Tim F. Haines, Roy La Barton Gay, William Grosshans and Denise A. Symdon |
| 3:2013cv00421 |
| June 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER Construing Notice of Appeal as Request to Proceed ifp. Leave to proceed ifp denied. The court CERTIFIES that the appeal is not taken in good faith for purposes of Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/18/2014. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
11
JUDGMENT entered denying plaintiff Eddie G. Evans's request for leave to proceed with his complaint and dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim. (PAO/nln). (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 6/24/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
