Nouis Technologies, Inc. v. Polaris Industries Inc. et al
| Nouis Technologies, Inc. |
| Polaris Industries, Inc. and Polaris Industries Manufacturing, LLC |
| 3:2014cv00233 |
| March 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Polk |
| William M Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER denying 101 Motion for Leave from Requirements of Administrative Order 311 re 92 Brief in Reply, 93 Declaration, and 98 Exhibit. Plaintiff has three days to comply with Administrative Order 311 by filing redacted public versions of Dkt. 92 and Dkt. 93 . Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/13/2015. (jls)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER overuling 83 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court by Defendants Polaris Industries Inc., Polaris Industries Manufacturing. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/28/2015. (jls)
|
|
Filing
76
OPINION and ORDER that Plaintiff Nouis Technologies, Inc.'s motion to strike defendants Polaris Industries Inc., Polaris Industries Inc., and Polaris Industries Manufacturing LLC's affirmative defenses and to dismiss their counterclaims, Dkt. 29 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/27/15. (jls)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER of dismissal without prejudice. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/6/2014. (voc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
