Wilke, Kevin v. Stublaski, Adam et al
Kevin L. Wilke |
Adam Stublaski, Matthew Stake, Brian Hayes, David Schwartz, Judge Wright, Judge Potter and Judge Dutcher |
3:2014cv00639 |
September 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Waushara |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 AMENDED JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 48 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the case. (rks),(ps) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying plaintiff leave to proceed on false imprisonment claims and on any claims against defendants Matthew Stake, Brian Hayes, David Schwartz, Judge Wright, Judge Potter and Judge Dutcher. These defendants are DISMISSED. Plaintiff may hav e until December 21, 2016, to file an amended complaint clearly setting forth the basis for his due process claims against defendant Adam Stublaski. If plaintiff fails to respond by that date, this case will be dismissed with prejudice and plaintiff will receive a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/30/2016. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Oppeneer on 9/24/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.