Cornelius, Kelli v. Aaron Recovery Systems LLC
Plaintiff: Kelli Cornelius
Defendant: Aaron Recovery Systems LLC
Case Number: 3:2015cv00122
Filed: February 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Wood
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT in favor of Kelli Cornelius against Aaron Recovery Systems LLC in the amount of $ 4,673.50. (WMC /PAO). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 15-122. (voc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cornelius, Kelli v. Aaron Recovery Systems LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelli Cornelius
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Recovery Systems LLC
Represented By: David Martin McDorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?