Schulenburg, Timothy v. Navient
| Timothy James Schulenburg |
| Navient |
| 3:2015cv00150 |
| March 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Sauk |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
JUDGMENT entered entered dismissing this case without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 8/16/2016. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER that the schedule for the rest of this case is modified, as indicated below. The parties are directed to participate in a mediation session with United States Magistrate Judge Peter Oppeneer. The new schedule will be as follows: By July 8, 2016, plaintiff must submit a notice that briefly articulates the legal theory or theories that he is pursing in this case. By July 8, 2016, plaintiff must file his brief in opposition to Navient's most recent motion for ju dgment on the pleadings. Dkt. 34 . Navient will not file a reply unless I ask for one. By July 8, 2016, both parties will submit pretrail materials, including motions in limine, exhibit lists, witness lists, proposed jury instructions, propo sed voir dire questions, and proposed special verdict forms. Navient does not need to resubmit these materials unless it has updated versions. By July 15, 2016, both parties must submit their responses, if any, to the other side's pretrial materials. On August 15, 2016, at 3:00 p.m., I will hold a Final Pretrial Conference. On August 22, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., the trial will begin. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/30/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 10 motion for judgment on the pleadings. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, plaintiff Timothy Schulenburg is entitled to relief from the judgment entered against him in case number 14-cv-774. The clerk of court is directed to docket a copy of this order in that case and to amend the judgment in that case to indicate that it was dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 15-150. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER that plaintiff Timothy Schulenburg has properly alleged a basis from which the court can exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 4/8/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that the parties may have until March 18, 2016, to file briefs addressing whether this court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/4/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schulenburg, Timothy v. Navient | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy James Schulenburg | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Navient | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
