Rozak, Ryan v. Hepp, Randall et al
| Ryan K. Rozak |
| Randall Hepp, George Cooper, Mark Schomisch, Holly Meier, Pauh and Otto |
| 3:2015cv00207 |
| April 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dodge |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| James D. Peterson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER that plaintiff Ryan Rozak may have until January 2, 2018, to respond to this order. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/14/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 4/25/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER dismissing plaintiff's 1 , 11 Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and 20. Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and 9 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel are denied without prejudice. Amended Complaint due 10/20/2015. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 9/30/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 102.07 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 5/11/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 4/20/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust Fund Account Statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 4/27/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 4/8/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
