Cases filed in the US District Court for the District of Minnesota Before Judge Montgomery
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,647
Shortymacknifisent v. Fogarty
as 0:2024cv01426
Plaintiff: Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Defendant: Kate M. Fogarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Moss v. Ouyang et al
as 0:2024cv00225
Plaintiff: Lonnie Dale Moss
Defendant: Grace Ouyang and Curi MMIC Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03838
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jama v. USA
as 0:2023cv03757
Petitioner: Abdiweli Mohamed Jama
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mosby et al v. State of MN
as 0:2023cv03604
Plaintiff: Alexisus Jarmon Mosby and D. Elise Bergeron
Defendant: State of MN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sinkfield v. Quasi Corporation of America, Etc, The
as 0:2023cv03551
Plaintiff: Deon Sinkfield, Jr
Defendant: Quasi Corporation of America, Etc, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. USA
as 0:2023cv03326
Petitioner: Chris Maurice Welch
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 0:2023cv03244
Plaintiff: Bill Lietzke
Defendant: City of Montgomery, Montgomery Police Department, Steven Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?