Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "bio engineered supplements & nutrition inc"
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
January 16, 2009
USA Laboratories, Inc. v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc. VA Eastern Trenga Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: USA Laboratories, Inc.; Defendant: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc.
 
November 6, 2007
Rivera et al v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc et al CA Central Selna Other Fraud Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff: Michael Rivera, Michael Rivera, Dan Abell, Dan Abell Defendant: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc, Christopher Ferguson, DOES
 
April 25, 2007
Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc v. Medical Research Institute TX Eastern Davis Antitrust Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc; Defendant: Medical Research Institute
 
March 5, 2007
Iovate Health Sciences Inc et al v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc TX Eastern Clark Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Iovate Health Sciences Inc, University of Florida Research Foundation Inc, Flamma SpA; Defendant: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc, Medical Research Institute
 
November 4, 2005
Medical Research Institute v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc et al TX Eastern Davis Patent Patent Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.