Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "donald carcieri"
Results 1 - 15 of 15
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
June 23, 2009
Higham v. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff: David Higham Defendant: A. T. Wall, Donald Carcieri, Rhode Island House of Representatives, Rhode Island Senate
 
February 20, 2009
Brown v. A.T. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Gerald M. Brown, Jr.; Defendant: A.T. Wall, Donald Carcieri, RI House of Representatives, RI Senate
 
Roscoe v. A.T. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: David A. Roscoe; Defendant: A.T. Wall, Donald Carcieri, RI House of Representatives, RI Senate
 
February 19, 2009
Chapdelaine v. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Theodore Chapdelaine; Defendant: A. T. Wall, RI House of Representatives, RI Senate, Donald Carcieri
 
Erdman v. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Fred Erdman; Defendant: A. T. Wall, RI House of Representatives, RI Senate, Donald Carcieri
 
February 17, 2009
Botelho v. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Christopher Botelho; Defendant: A. T. Wall, Donald Carcieri, RI House of Representatives, RI Senate
 
Krushnowski v. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Karl Krushnowski; Defendant: A. T. Wall, Donald Carcieri, RI House of Representatives, RI Senate
 
Waters v. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Dana N. Waters; Defendant: A. T. Wall, Donald Carcieri, RI House of Representatives, RI Senate
 
February 13, 2009
Lyons v. Wall et al RI Lisi Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Kevin M. Lyons; Defendant: A. T. Wall, Donald Carcieri, Rhode Island House of Representatives, Rhode Island Senate
 
October 16, 2008
Rhode Island Counsel 94 et al v. State of Rhode Island et al RI Smith Constitutionality of State Statutes Federal Question
Plaintiff: Rhode Island Counsel 94, A.F.S.C.M.E., AFL-CIO, Cindy Paquin, Linda Loveday and others...; Defendant: State of Rhode Island, Donald L. Carcieri, Jerome F. Williams, Frank T. Caprio
 
August 27, 2008
Erdman v. Carcieri et al RI Lisi Civil Rights Federal Question
Petitioner: Fred Erdman, Respondent: Donald Carcieri, A. T. Wall, R.I. Department of Corrections, R.I. Parole Board
 
September 25, 2007
Kelley v. Carcieri et al RI Hagopian Other Civil Rights Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff: Jirah Eric Kelley; Defendant: Donald Carcieri, A. T. Wall, James Weeden, Boyd, Michael Poshkus and others...
 
September 17, 2007
Becker v. Warden Hudson et al RI Smith Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff: Jan Becker; Defendant: Warden Hudson, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed, Paul D Clement, A Gonzales and others...
 
June 28, 2007
M. et al v. Carcieri et al RI Lagueux Other Civil Rights Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff: Sam M., Tony M., Caesar S., David T., Briana H. and others...; Defendant: Donald L. Carcieri, Jane A. Hayward, Patricia Martinez
 
January 22, 2007
Keselica v. Carcieri et al RI Lisi Other Civil Rights Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff: Michael G. Keselica; Defendant: Donald L. Carcieri, Patrick Lynch, John Corrigan, Timothy Kane, Raymond Morrogh
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.