Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "edward charles prado"
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
August 31, 2009
Carrasquillo et al v. Upton et al TX Eastern Clark Other Civil Rights Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff: Eddie Carrasquillo, Fabian Towers, Christopher Bush, Michael Watts, David Wallace and others... Defendant: Jody R. Upton, Gerardo Maldonado, Jr., Joyce Conley, Tim Outlaw, Gerhart Bradley and others...
 
October 14, 2008
Washington v. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit et al LA Eastern Livaudais Other Civil Rights U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff: Lester L. Washington; Defendant: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit, Thomas M. Reavley, James L Dennis, Edward Charles Prado, Edith H Jones and others...
 
April 3, 2007
Abitbol et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al CA Northern Breyer Personal Injury- Product Liability Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Haim V. Abitbol, Richard A. Ables, Sr., Santos Abreu Cruz, Ramon Acosta Rodriguez, Muttasim G. Ahmed and others...; Defendant: Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corporation, G.D. Searle, LLC
 
January 4, 2007
Shaw et al v. Rogers et al MS Southern Starrett Other Civil Rights Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff: Charles R. Shaw; Defendant: Jeffery Rogers, Thomas M. Matthews, Jr., Teresa Dearman, Roger T. Clark, S. Allan Alexander and others...
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.