Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "jpmorgan chase bank, national assocation"
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
April 29, 2009
Sashi Dormanesh et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al CA Central Guilford Other Statutory Actions Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Plaintiff: Sashi Dormanesh, Mohammad Ali Hedayati Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank National Assocation, JPMorgan Chase Bank National Assocation, Washington Mutual Bank FA, Washington Mutual Bank FA, California Reconveyance Company and others...
 
July 31, 2008
Hastings et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assocation TX Eastern Schell Other Contract Diversity
Plaintiff: Robert Hastings, Julie Hastings; Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assocation
 
July 29, 2008
Stambler v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al TX Eastern Folsom Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Leon Stambler; Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assocation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, National Association, Citigroup Inc. and others...
 
May 12, 2008
Stambler v. JPMorgan Chase & Co et al TX Eastern Folsom Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Leon Stambler; Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assocation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, National Association, Citigroup Inc. and others...
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.