Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "louis psihoyos"
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
October 9, 2009
Psihoyos v. NBC Universal, Inc. et al NY Southern Daniels Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Louis P. Psihoyos Defendant: NBC Universal, Inc., David Baumber, Getty Images (US), Inc.
 
September 16, 2009
Psihoyos v. Apple, Inc. et al NY Southern Marrero Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Louis P. Psihoyos Defendant: Apple, Inc., Apple Computers, Inc.
 
September 3, 2009
DirecTV, Inc. v. Louis Psihoyos et al CA Central Anderson Other Copyright Infringement
August 19, 2009
Psihoyos v. Apple, Inc. et al NY Southern Baer Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Louis P. Psihoyos Defendant: Apple, Inc., Apple Computers, Inc.
 
July 24, 2009
Psihoyos v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. NY Southern Batts Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Louis P. Psihoyos Defendant: Hachette Book Group, Inc.
 
July 23, 2009
Wu et al v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company NY Southern Baer Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Norbert Wu, Louis P. Psihoyos Defendant: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
 
June 27, 2007
Psihoyos v. Apple, Inc. et al
court opinions & orders
CO Blackburn Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Louis Psihoyos; Defendant: Apple, Inc., Apple Computers, Inc.
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.