Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "palomar grading & paving, inc."
Results 1 - 10 of 10
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
August 3, 2009
United States For Use And Benefit Of Southern Pacific Materials, Inc. v. Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. et al CA Central Otero Other (130) Miller Act
Plaintiff: United States For Use And Benefit Of Southern Pacific Materials, Inc., United States For Use And Benefit Of Southern Pacific Materials, Inc., United States For Use And Benefit Of Southern Pacific Materials, Inc. Defendant: Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc., Pave-Tech, Inc., Doe Surety No. 1 Counter Claimant: Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. Counter Defendant: United States For Use And Benefit Of Southern Pacific Materials, Inc., United States For Use And Benefit Of Southern Pacific Materials, Inc., United States For Use And Benefit Of Southern Pacific Materials, Inc.
 
May 29, 2009
Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Palomar Grading and Paving, Inc. CA Central IncBRUnassigned Other Statutory Actions Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff: Northwest Administrators, Inc. Defendant: Palomar Grading and Paving, Inc.
 
Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Palomar Grading and Paving, Inc. CA Central IncBRUnassigned Other Statutory Actions Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff: Northwest Administrators, Inc. Defendant: Palomar Grading and Paving, Inc.
 
February 9, 2009
Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. CA Northern Chesney Other
Plaintiff: Northwest Administrators, Inc.; Defendant: Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc.
 
January 16, 2009
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Palomar Grading & Paving Inc WA Western Zilly Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: Northwest Administrators Inc; Defendant: Palomar Grading & Paving Inc
 
November 20, 2008
The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Teamsters Pension Trust Fund et al v. Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc. CA Southern Sammartino Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Health and Welfare Trust Fund, The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Teamsters Vacation Trust Fund, The San Diego County Teamsters Training and Retraining Trust Fund; Defendant: Palomar Grading & Paving, Inc.
 
September 12, 2008
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Palomar Grading and Paving Inc WA Western Zilly Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: Northwest Administrators Inc; Defendant: Palomar Grading and Paving Inc
 
April 2, 2008
Bill Lowe Developments et al v. Western Insurance Company et al CA Southern Lorenz Other Contract U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff: Bill Lowe Developments, Bill Lowe Developments, For the Use and Benefit of the USA; Defendant: Western Insurance Company, Zurich North American Surety, Cornerstone Building Group, Palomar Grading and Paving, Inc.
 
March 20, 2008
Palomar Grading and Paving Inc et al v. Western Insurance Company et al CA Southern Houston Miller Act Miller Act
Plaintiff: Palomar Grading and Paving Inc, The United States of America for the use and benefit of Palomar Grading And Paving, Inc.; Defendant: Western Insurance Company, Cornerstone Building Group
 
August 11, 2005
Southwest Administrators Inc v. Palomar Grading and Paving Inc CA Central Anderson Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.