Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "rabile family dentistry, p.c."
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
November 12, 2008
Berry et al v. Bryan Cave LLP et al TX Northern Boyle Other Fraud Diversity
Plaintiff: Stephen Berry, Fader Higher LLC, Mehmet C Pekerol, Jamie Hughes, Stanton Greene and others...; Defendant: Bryan Cave LLP, Richard C Smith, American Express Tax & Business Services Inc, Pension Strategies IBP LLC, Pension Strategies LLC
 
September 26, 2008
Berry et al v. Bryan Cave, LLP et al AZ Murguia Other Fraud Diversity
Plaintiff: Stephen Berry, Fader Higher, LLC, Mehmet C. Pekerol, M.D., Mehmet C. Pekerol, M.D., P.C., Jamie Hughes and others...; Defendant: Bryan Cave, LLP, Richard C. Smith, American Express Tax & Busiiness Services, Inc. dba Actuarial and Administrative Services, Inc. and/or AAS Pension Services, Pension Strategies, IBP, LLC, Pension Strategies, LLC
 
February 12, 2008
Berry et al v. Indianapolis Life Insurance Company et al TX Northern Boyle Insurance Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff: Stephen Berry, Fader Higher LLC, Mehmet C Pekerol, Mehmet C Pekerol MD PC, Jamie Hughes and others...; Defendant: Indianapolis Life Insurance Company, Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company, Pacific Life Insurance Company, American General Life Insurance Company, Economic Concepts Inc and others...
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.