Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "reuters limited"
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
May 12, 2009
API Technologies, LLC v. Facebook, Inc. et al
All eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings) and court opinions & orders
court opinions & orders
TX Eastern Ward Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: API Technologies, LLC Defendant: Facebook, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services LLC, AOL LLC, Mapquest, Inc. and others...
 
May 19, 2008
Facetime Communications, Inc. v. Reuters Limited
All eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings) and court opinions & orders
NY Southern McMahon Other Contract Federal Question
Plaintiff: Facetime Communications, Inc.; Defendant: Reuters Limited
 
May 13, 2008
Thomson Canada Limited et al v. Thomson-Reuters.Com
All eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings) and court opinions & orders
VA Eastern Hilton Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: Thomson Canada Limited, Reuters Limited; Defendant: Thomson-Reuters.Com
 
February 6, 2008
Thomson Canada Limited et al v. THOMSONREUTERS.COM VA Eastern Lee Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: Thomson Canada Limited, Reuters Limited; Defendant: THOMSONREUTERS.COM
 
November 16, 2005
Ariel (UK) Limited v. Reuters Group, P.L.C. et al NY Southern Keenan Copyrights Copyright Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.