Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "romero general construction corporation"
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
November 20, 2008
The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Teamsters Pension Trust Fund et al v. Romero General Construction Corporation CA Southern Miller Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Federal Question
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Teamsters Pension Trust Fund, The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Health and Welfare Trust Fund, The Board of Trustees of the San Diego County Teamsters Vacation Trust Fund, The San Diego County Teamsters Training and Retraining Trust Fund; Defendant: Romero General Construction Corporation
 
April 29, 2008
ROMERO v. W.S. CUMBY & SON BUILDERS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS et al PA Eastern BAYLSON Other Personal Injury Diversity
Plaintiff: MARLON ROMERO; Defendant: W.S. CUMBY & SON BUILDERS & CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS, MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES, THOMAS ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION, R&B GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others...
 
January 2, 2008
ROMERO v. E.D. BULLARD et al PA Eastern GILES Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff: HERB A. ROMERO; Defendant: E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON, A.C. AND S., INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others...
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.