Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "slide, inc."
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
June 20, 2009
Caldwell v. Atlantic Recording Corporation et al NC Western Conrad Copyrights Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Romell Caldwell Defendant: Atlantic Recording Corporation, Slip N Slide Records, Inc., Algernod Lanier Washington
 
December 5, 2008
United States of America v. Montag et al NY Eastern Amon Other
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: David H. Montag, Mark Slide Fastener, Inc.
 
October 30, 2008
Hypertouch, Inc v. Azoogle, Inc et al CA Northern Chesney Other Statutory Actions Federal Question
Plaintiff: Hypertouch, Inc; Defendant: Azoogle.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation d/b/a Epic Advertising, Inc., Azoogleleads USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation d/b/a Epic Advertising, Inc., Quicken Loans, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Subscriberbase, Inc., a South Carolina corporation d/b/a Addrive.com, Consumer Research Coropration, Inc., Free Slide, Inc., and Subscriberbase Holdings, Inc.
 
Hypertouch, Inc v. Azoogle, Inc et al
All eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings) and court opinions & orders
CA Northern Brazil Other Statutory Actions Federal Question
Plaintiff: Hypertouch, Inc; Defendant: Azoogle.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation d/b/a Epic Advertising, Inc., Azoogleleads USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation d/b/a Epic Advertising, Inc., Quicken Loans, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Subscriberbase, Inc., a South Carolina corporation d/b/a Addrive.com, Consumer Research Coropration, Inc., Free Slide, Inc., and Subscriberbase Holdings, Inc.
 
Hypertouch, Inc v. Azoogle, Inc et al CA Northern Other Statutory Actions Petition for Removal
Plaintiff: Hypertouch, Inc, Hypertouch, Inc Defendant: Azoogle.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation d/b/a Epic Advertising, Inc., Azoogleleads USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation d/b/a Epic Advertising, Inc., Quicken Loans, Inc., a Michigan corporation, Subscriberbase, Inc., a South Carolina corporation d/b/a Addrive.com, Consumer Research Coropration, Inc., Free Slide, Inc., and Subscriberbase Holdings, Inc.
 
July 7, 2008
Slide, Inc. v. Paid Post, Inc. et al CA Northern Lloyd Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: Slide, Inc.; Defendant: Paid Post, Inc., Lawrence Lee, Jason Ward
 
July 2, 2008
PAIDPOST, INC. v. SLIDE INC. NJ Sheridan Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: PAIDPOST, INC.; Defendant: SLIDE INC.
 
May 12, 2008
FotoMedia Technologies, LLC v. Fujifilm U.S.A, Inc. et al TX Eastern Ward Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: FotoMedia Technologies, LLC; Defendant: FotoFlix, Inc., Amiglia, Inc., EZ Prints, Inc., Flektor, Inc., FotoTime, Inc. and others...
 
September 7, 2007
Slide-Lok Modular Storage Systems, Inc. v. GIBL, L.L.C., et al AZ Wake Other Contract Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff: Slide-Lok Modular Storage Systems, Inc.; Defendant: GIBL, L.L.C., Brandin Lowry, Dustin Lowry, Hannah LowryCounter Claimant: GIBL, L.L.C., Brandin Lowry, Dustin Lowry, Hannah Lowry, Counter Defendant: Slide-Lok Modular Storage Systems, Inc. and others...
 
March 30, 2007
Com Pac Filtration, Inc. v. USA Slide, Inc. FL Middle Adams Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff: Com Pac Filtration, Inc.; Defendant: USA Slide, Inc.
 
October 2, 2006
Suncast Corporation v. Slide-Lok Modular Storage Systems, Inc. et al IL Northern Zagel Patent Patent Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.