Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "smith & nephew holdings, inc."
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
January 30, 2009
Zimmer Holdings Inc et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc IN Northern Simon Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Zimmer Holdings Inc, Zimmer GmbH; Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc
 
August 11, 2008
MCCULLOUGH et al v. ZIMMER, INC. et al PA Western Schwab Antitrust Federal Question
Plaintiff: RICHARD H. MCCULLOUGH, HOLLY A. MCCULLOUGH; Defendant: ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., DUPUY ORTHOPEDICS, INC., SMITH AND NEPHEW, INC., BIOMET, INC. and others...
 
May 8, 2008
Archuleta et al v. Houseworth et al CO Krieger Personal Injury- Product Liability Diversity
Plaintiff: Samantha Archuleta, Rosemarie Carroll; Defendant: Stephen W. Houseworth, Smith & Nephew, Inc., DJO, Incorporated, Reable Therapeutics, LLC, I-Flow Corporation and others...
 
February 21, 2008
Hansen v. DJO, Incorporated et al CO Matsch Personal Injury- Product Liability Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff: Stacey Ann Hansen; Defendant: DJO, Incorporated, Reable Therapeutics, LLC, I-Flow Corporation, Oratec Interventions, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc. and others...
 
February 8, 2008
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. et al v. Bluesky Medical Corporation et al TX Western Furgeson Patent Federal Question
Plaintiff: Kinetic Concepts, Inc., KCI Licensing, Inc., KCI USA Inc., Wake Forest University Health Sciences; Defendant: Bluesky Medical Corporation, Smith & Nephew, Inc., ., Smith & Nephew Holdings, Inc., Smith & Nephew PLCCounter Defendant: Kinetic Concepts, Inc., KCI Licensing, Inc. and others...
 
May 14, 2007
Kinetic Concepts Inc et al v. Bluesky Medical Corp TX Eastern Ward Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Kinetic Concepts Inc, KCI Licensing Inc, KCI USA Inc, Wake Forest Univerisity Health Sciences; Defendant: Bluesky Medical Corp, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Smith & Nephew Holdings, Inc., Smith & Nephew, PLC.
 
May 4, 2007
KIRSCHNER v. BIOMET, INC et al IN Southern Tinder Antitrust Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: SUZANNE KIRSCHNER; Defendant: BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER, INC, STRYKER CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. and others...
 
WILLIAMS v. BIOMET, INC et al IN Southern Tinder Antitrust Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: JOHN WILLIAMS; Defendant: BIOMET, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER, INC, STRYKER CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others...
 
May 2, 2007
CHAIKEN v. BIOMET, INC et al IN Southern Tinder Antitrust Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS; Defendant: BIOMET, INC, IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC, DEPUY, INC, DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others...
 
April 23, 2007
SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al IN Southern Tinder Antitrust Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff: SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC; Defendant: ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER, INC, STRYKER CORPORATION, BIOMET, INC, DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC and others...
 
April 19, 2007
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
All eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings) and court opinions & orders
IN Southern Tinder Antitrust Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff: PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, SUZANNE KIRSCHNER, JOHN WILLIAMS; Defendant: BIOMET, INC, IMPLANT INNOVATIONS, INC, DEPUY, INC, DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others...
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.