Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Search for: "tagged, inc."
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
August 12, 2009
Slater et al v. Tagged, Inc. et al CA Northern Chen Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Miriam Slater, Miriam Slater, Miriam Slater, Miriam Slater, Sara Golden and others... Defendant: Tagged, Inc., Greg Tseng, Johann Schleier--Smith
 
April 17, 2009
Tagged, Inc. v. Affiliate Programs for SCORESLIVE.COM et al CA Northern White Other Statutory Actions Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Affiliate Programs for SCORESLIVE.COM, Affiliate spammers for SCORESLIVE.COM
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 Through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Amateurmatch.com et al CA Northern Armstrong Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 Through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Amateurmatch.com, Does 11 Through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for Amateurmatch.com
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 Through 10 as Affiliate Programs for CPALEAD.COM et al CA Northern Armstrong Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 Through 10 as Affiliate Programs for CPALEAD.COM, Does 11 Through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for CPALEAD.COM
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 Through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Flirtgarden.net et al CA Northern Armstrong Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 Through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Flirtgarden.net, Does 11 Through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for Flirtgarden.net
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Adultwebfind.com et al CA Northern Spero Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Adultwebfind.com, Does 11 through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for Adultwebfind.Com
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Epicstreams.Com et al CA Northern Patel Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Epicstreams.Com, Does 11 through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for Epicstreams.Com
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Isecurebill.com et al CA Northern Armstrong Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Isecurebill.com, Does 11 through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for Isecurebill.com
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Isecurebill.com et al CA Northern Zimmerman Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for Isecurebill.com, Does 11 through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for Isecurebill.com
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for WILDXXXFANTASIES.COM et al CA Northern Chesney Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for WILDXXXFANTASIES.COM, Does 11 through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for WILDXXXFANTASIES.COM
 
Tagged, Inc. v. Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for xxxblackbook.com et al CA Northern Alsup Other Statutory Actions Fed. Question
Plaintiff: Tagged, Inc., Tagged, Inc. Defendant: Does 1 through 10 as Affiliate Programs for xxxblackbook.com, Does 11 through 500 as Affiliate Spammers for xxxblackbook.com
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.