Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pincus v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2016cv04705
Plaintiff:
Stacy Pincus
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strumlauf et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2016cv01306
Plaintiff:
Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 7:2010cv09085
Plaintiff:
Kraft Foods Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carly E. Simon v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2009cv09074
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Starbucks Corporation v. Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd et al
as 2:2009cv01230
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and others
Cross Claimant:
Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd
Cross Defendant:
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. and Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
ThirdParty Defendant:
Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Joshi, et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Rakesh Joshi, Rakesh Joshi, Pranika Joshi and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Driessen et al v. Starbucks et al
as 2:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
James L. Driessen and Marguerite A. Driessen
Defendant:
Starbucks and Apple Computer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Gates v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mark Robert Gates
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Jim McDonald, Park Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
