Federal cases, dockets and filings from U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal

Cases filed


Cases 41 - 50 of 215,939
Trent Taylor v. Marion Williams
as 17-10342
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRENT TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee: MELISSA OLMSTEAD, Correctional Officer, Individually and in their official capacity
Christopher Irby v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10343
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER IRBY
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: Wade Bigelow
as 17-20203
Petitioner: In re: WADE HAMPTON BIGELOW
USA v. Heriberto Rubio-Garcia
as 17-20204
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: HERIBERTO RUBIO-GARCIA
KyJunta Hillis, et al v. Education Affiliates, Inc., et al
as 17-20205
Plaintiff - Appellant: KYJUNTA HILLIS, ex rel., DEIKA KING, ex rel., CRYSTAL WICKS, ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee: EDUCATION AFFILIATES, INCORPORATED, MEDVANCE INSTITUTE, doing business as Fortis College, KIMC SOUTHWEST HOUSTON, L.L.C. and others
In re: Sylvester Trackling
as 17-30225
Movant: In re: SYLVESTER TRACKLING
Taylor Carlisle v. Newell Normand
as 17-30226
Petitioner - Appellant: TAYLOR CARLISLE
Respondent - Appellee: NEWELL NORMAND, Warden, Jefferson Parish Correctional Center
Kevin Taylor v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 17-30227
Petitioner - Appellant: KEVIN TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee: DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Mary Bankston, et al v. Clay Hamilton, et al
as 17-30228
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARY SELF BANKSTON, on behalf of minor child, GENEIVA SELF BANKSTON
Defendant - Appellee: CLAY HAMILTON, BRIAN THOMPSON, JAMES M. MILLER and others
Movant - Appellant: L. E., CHAROLETTE BANKSTON, KATHERINE LEWIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-30229
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?