First Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 28,577
Diaz-Santiago v. Sanchez-Acosta, et al
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
RAY LEONERDIRT DIAZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant:
JOSE SANCHEZ-ACOSTA, Attorney and MANUEL CIDRE-MIRANDA
Morgan v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10730
Plaintiff:
Veronica Morgan
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Productions SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10713
Plaintiff:
Lavonna Lee
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marney v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10714
Plaintiff:
Melvin Marney
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Krauskopf v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10712
Plaintiff:
Douglas Krauskopf
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mason v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10715
Plaintiff:
Janet Mason
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mekni v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10716
Plaintiff:
Annette Mekni
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steele v. Boston Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv10717
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Shirley Williams Steele
Defendant:
Boston Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kelly v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10696
Plaintiff:
Charolyn Kelly
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10695
Plaintiff:
Marvin Johnson
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
