US District Court for the District of Maine Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DICKERSON
as 2:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JAMAL DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEABAY et al v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
CHAD DEABAY and DEABAY OUTDOORS INC
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HICKSON v. ASSAL et al
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C HICKSON
Defendant:
SHERIF ASSAL and SHERINE ASSAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DALTON v. REID et al
as 1:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA RENEE DALTON
Defendant:
LAURA LEE REID and ALEXANDRIA V SEYFRIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. BLANCHARD
as 2:2012cv00323
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
KATHY BLANCHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
USA et al v. AMBULANCE SERVICES INC et al
as 1:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
USA and MAINE, STATE OF
Defendant:
AMBULANCE SERVICES INC and NORTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRANN
as 1:2008cv00394
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANNETTE P BRANN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
ROCKPORT WHALE WATCH INC v. HAWLEY et al
as 2:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
ROCKPORT WHALE WATCH INC
Defendant:
VAUGHAN HAWLEY and ANN M STICKNEY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GENWORTH LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEENEY
as 2:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
GENWORTH LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DONNA FEENEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY CO. v. FORE RIVER WAREHOUSING & STORAGE CO
as 2:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY CO
Defendant:
FORE RIVER WAREHOUSING & STORAGE CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
