Maine Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 214
VEILLEUX et al v. GENIE INDUSTRIES
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
DONALD J VEILLEUX and MARGARET E VEILLEUX
Defendant:
GENIE INDUSTRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NADEAU v. ZIMMER INC
as 1:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NADEAU
Defendant:
ZIMMER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GROLLEY et al v. ZIMMER INC et al
as 2:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
JANET GROLLEY and JOHN GROLLEY
Defendant:
ZIMMER INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC and ZIMMER ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BONNEAU v. R F HUNTER CO INC
as 2:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
DEREK BONNEAU
Defendant:
R F HUNTER CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BRIDGES v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC
as 1:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
TODD A BRIDGES
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SINGLETON v. LEKTRO INC
as 1:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
HINSON B SINGLETON
Defendant:
LEKTRO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCILVAINE et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
TETYANA MCILVAINE and MICHAEL MCILVAINE
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LICHTENSTEIN et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
as 2:2011cv00463
Plaintiff:
RHONDA LICHTENSTEIN and ROBERT LICHTENSTEIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP et al
as 2:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
EMMIE JONES and JONES
Defendant:
FAIRBANK RECONSTRUCTION CORP and GREATER OMAHA PACKING COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GRAMOLINI v. KENSOL-FRANKLIN INC et al
as 1:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
JUNE M GRAMOLINI
Defendant:
KENSOL-FRANKLIN INC and THOMSON NATIONAL PRESS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
