Maine Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 92
USA v. $149,000 CURRENCY
as 1:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$149,000 CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. $15,530 CURRENCY
as 2:2008cv00361
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$15,530 CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. ASSORTED FIREARMS et al
as 1:2008cv00352
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ASSORTED FIREARMS, FIREARMS PARTS and AMMUNITION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. CONTENTS OF BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 1979001375, LOCATED AT NORTHEAST BANK, LEWISTON, MAINE
as 2:2008cv00297
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. FORTY-FOUR ASSORTED FIREARMS et al
as 1:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
FORTY-FOUR ASSORTED FIREARMS and ASSORTED AMMUNITION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. LEE, CORBETT ROAD
as 1:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
LEE, CORBETT ROAD
Claimant:
DANIEL G LITTLEFIELD
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. $31,886 CURRENCY
as 2:2007cv00219
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$31,886 CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RUGER MARK II 22 CALIBER PISTOL
as 1:2007cv00106
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RUGER MARK II 22 CALIBER PISTOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
TOZIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00099
Plaintiff:
FRANK TOZIER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , FARM SERVICE AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR and AGRICULTURE, US DEPARTMENT OF
Counter_claimant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , FARM SERVICE AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR and AGRICULTURE, US DEPARTMENT OF
Counter_defendant:
FRANK TOZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. $16,942.25 CURRENCY
as 2:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$16,942.25 CURRENCY
Claimant:
EASTON WILSON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
