Maine Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 474
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MARTIN v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
KRISTA MARTIN
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BURKE v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
AMY BURKE
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BUTLER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
DONNA BUTLER
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LEBLANC v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEBLANC
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
THOMPSON v. JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave Act
DOUGLASS v. MAINE MACHINE PRODUCTS CO et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
ERIKA DOUGLASS
Defendant:
MAINE MACHINE PRODUCTS CO and GENNX 360 CAPITAL PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
CARBUCCIA v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CARBUCCIA
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SARGENT v. MAINEHEALTH
as 2:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE SARGENT
Defendant:
MAINEHEALTH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave Act
DELVA et al v. EAGLE'S LODGE INC
as 1:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
JEANINE DELVA, MARIE DENISE DERISSE, MARIE MYRLENE HALL-HOLLY and others
Defendant:
EAGLE'S LODGE INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
