US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,607
Burnham v. Colorado Parole Board
as 1:2024cv11056
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Colorado Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aguiar v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv10987
Petitioner:
Stephen Aguiar
Respondent:
Fred Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zinser v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2024cv10847
Petitioner:
Lawrence Zinser
Respondent:
Steve Kennedy and AGO Andrea Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Coleman v. Lynds
as 3:2024cv30043
Plaintiff:
Wayland X Coleman
Defendant:
Joann Lynds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trenkler v. Rich
as 1:2024cv10780
Petitioner:
Alfred Trenkler
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
St. John v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv10646
Petitioner:
Sandra Natasha St. John
Respondent:
Andrea Joy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv10555
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10534
Petitioner:
Miguel A. Rivera
Respondent:
Nelson B. Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Carter
as 1:2024cv10496
Petitioner:
Patrick Franklin Harris
Respondent:
Ricardo R. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montrond v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40032
Petitioner:
Pedro Montrond
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
