New Hampshire Social Security Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 710
Hampers v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Kristin Carney Hampers
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Budlong v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Budlong
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wiggin v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Charles Philip Wiggin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thomas v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. US Social Security Administration
as 1:2022fp00534
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Crosby v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Crosby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clark v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Clark
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Gage v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Leah M. Gage
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ulitsch v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
David Ulitsch
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Duclos v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Duclos and Jennifer Lynn Duclos
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
